← Google · Gemini Individual model view Google · Gemini

gemini-2.0-flash-001

Appears in 6 benchmarksMean lean (confidence − pass rate): +0.275/6 benchmarks lean overconfident (prospective probe)

Positioning spread: every benchmark, one model

0.000.250.500.751.00SQuAD (factual recall)MMLU-Pro (knowledge)LegalBench (legal reasoning)MathBench (competition math)OmniMath (advanced math)SciCode (scientific code)performanceconfidence (red gap = overconfident)
Performance vs. confidence for gemini-2.0-flash-001, per benchmark (prospective probe).
BenchmarkTask accConfidenceF₁Leans
SQuAD (factual recall)0.450.640.68+0.19 overconfident
MMLU-Pro (knowledge)0.450.990.62+0.54 overconfident
LegalBench (legal reasoning)0.850.700.73-0.15 cautious
MathBench (competition math)0.891.000.95+0.10 overconfident
OmniMath (advanced math)0.470.980.64+0.51 overconfident
SciCode (scientific code)0.510.950.65+0.44 overconfident

In the full cloud

-3-3-2-2-1-100112233Performance z-score within benchmark/probe →Confidence z-score →
gemini-2.0-flash-001 conditions all other model/condition points equal relative confidence and pass rate

Pairwise signal: pairs involving gemini-2.0-flash-001

Match accuracy controls for the performance base-rate gap
gemini-2.0-flash-001 pairs
18/ 171
gemini-2.0-flash-001 mean tau
+0.027
All-pairs mean
+0.037
gemini-2.0-flash-001 p<0.05
8(44.4%)
-1.0-0.50.00.51.0Pair signal: do confidence gaps rank performance gaps? (Kendall tau-b)
all model pairs (observed) base-rate-matched null calibration-preserving null gemini-2.0-flash-001 pair (filled = p<0.05) gemini-2.0-flash-001 mean all-pairs mean

The four metacognitive outcomes

No curated cases for this selection yet — outcome-matrix extraction currently covers a sample of MMLU-Pro trials.
vs gemini-2.5-flash →vs gemini-2.5-pro →vs gemini-3-flash-preview →vs gemini-3-pro-preview →vs gemini-3.1-pro-preview → Compare with anything →